4th Aug 2012 () - Critique my paper

Notes from reading my Paper:

Introduction would have to change. Can be done at the end of the paper.
Objectives remains the same
Do I want to create a new model for UA as part of my objectives?

Lit review - do more for lit review look for back up evidence on the UA findings - look for linkage

Lit review and findings of UA - did not link the with lit review with the findings.disjoint

Survey was linked to Lit review - good

Recommendations

The recommendations did not lead up from what was said before. More flow needed.
Out of nowhere the recommendations showed up with not enough into into the recommendations.

Development solution - did not see how the lit review catered or supported this angle or part  of the solution


The final recommendations is jus combining UA, change mangement solution with dev technique - is this anything new?
or can be augmented  into something bigger and new/original

Change model - I am jsut reusing someone else's model, but what can i add to make it better model, more accurate

Link long term strategies what was referenced in the lit review for flow

User acceptance metric


Critical Eval on user acceptance metric